Skip to content
FOR SPECIALIST TEAMS · GRIMSBYGrimsby

Your expertise.Across borders.

A Grimsby L-1B applicant may possess organizational knowledge also held by colleagues. Assess the actual special or advanced knowledge rather than claiming unsupported exclusivity or assuming a colleague’s similar skills decide the case.

Talk about L-1B
PurposeSpecialised knowledge transfer
Company linkQualifying related businesses
EvidenceSpecific knowledge and duties

IN THIS GUIDE · Explain shared knowledge without claiming that no other employee has it

Start with the L-1B eligibility and application overview

01

Describe the qualifying knowledge accurately

The standard covers special knowledge of the organization’s products, services, research, equipment, techniques, management or other interests and their application in international markets, or advanced knowledge or expertise in its processes and procedures. It is not universally required to be unique, secret or proprietary.

02

Explain the individual contribution

Hypothetical example: three employees can use the same process, but only one has handled the implementation issues relevant to the proposed assignment. Identify those issues and the employee’s actual response using permitted project records. Then state what colleagues also know. The comparison should explain the transfer without making an unsupported claim of irreplaceability. A team achievement should not be attributed entirely to the applicant, and ordinary professional competence should not be renamed company expertise.

03

Build the applicant’s chronology independently of the team

List the actual foreign employer, full-time duties and work locations for the relevant preceding three years. The ordinary L rule generally needs one continuous full-time foreign year in managerial, executive or specialized-knowledge employment. A colleague’s earlier start cannot fill a missing month. Brief U.S. travel need not break continuity, but those U.S. days do not count toward the foreign year. Identify the actual parent, branch, subsidiary or affiliate relationship, and evidence regular, systematic and continuous business in the United States and at least one other country throughout the relevant stay.

04

Examine the actual placement

For work principally at an unaffiliated employer’s site, L-1B is unavailable if that employer principally controls and supervises the worker, or if the arrangement is essentially labor for hire rather than a placement connected with the petitioner’s product or service requiring specialized knowledge. A new-office L-1B case also has premises and financial-ability requirements.

05

Determine whether the receiving operation is a new office

Use the date U.S. doing business began, rather than the group’s founding date: less than one year falls within the new-office framework. L-1B requires sufficient premises and financial ability to pay the employee and begin business, and initial new-office approval lasts at most one year. A training plan can explain the employee’s knowledge, but cannot establish premises or funding. Ask the relevant company officers to identify the records supporting those separate conditions before relying on a launch date.

06

Industry certification is general skill, not specialized knowledge

A widely held certification demonstrates general industry knowledge and does not, by itself, establish specialized knowledge. Where the transferee will work primarily at a third party’s worksite, the petitioner must retain control and supervision of the work, and the placement must not be labour for hire supplying a worker to the client. If any part of the work will be performed at a reinsurer's or vendor's premises, the petition must show the analyst remains controlled and supervised by the petitioning group and is providing the company's own specialized knowledge, not labour for hire. Placement that is really the supply of labour to be managed by the customer does not qualify, even if the person's knowledge is specialized. Exclude US days from that calculation, recognizing that qualifying brief visits do not themselves interrupt continuity. Training records, internal manuals, product diagrams, version histories, and manager declarations should show both the distinctive knowledge and how the employee will apply it. Compare the claimed advanced capability with the actual tasks; a role requiring only basic use of the manual may not support the proposed account. Vague statements that the worker is valuable tend to fail because they never identify what the worker knows or how that knowledge was learned.

L-1B · GRIMSBY

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.