Read the general investor planning overview
Lawful source of funds is a documentary question, and it is answered with a chain rather than a statement. Every dollar of qualifying capital should be traceable from how it was earned, through the account that held it, to the enterprise that received it. Build that chain before signing anything, because the weakest link is almost always a transfer nobody kept a record of.
Follow the money in one continuous chain
Hypothetical example: a purchase is funded partly from the sale of a Canadian property and partly by a loan advanced from a family holding company. Each source needs its own account of itself: how the property was acquired and paid for, the closing statement on its sale, the deposit of the proceeds, and the transfer into the business; and for the loan, the agreement, the lender’s own funds and whatever security was given. Gifts, inheritances, dividends, proceeds from selling a business and accumulated earnings are all acceptable origins, and each is documented differently. What is not acceptable is a gap — a balance appearing in an account with nothing to explain how it arrived. Assemble statements that run continuously across the transfer dates rather than snapshots chosen for convenience.
Which borrowing counts, and which does not
Borrowed money can become qualifying capital, but only where the investor personally carries the risk of it. Debt for which the investor is personally liable, or that is secured solely by assets outside the business, may count according to its actual terms. Debt secured by the assets of the enterprise itself does not count, and it does not begin to count because personal assets were pledged alongside the business assets. Timing follows the same logic: funds must be irrevocably committed and genuinely at risk, so money that can still be recalled has not yet been invested at all. Where the sequence requires payment before a decision, a genuine escrow that releases irrevocably on visa issuance is the recognised way to hold that position without pretending the commitment already happened.
Traced capital still has to meet every other condition
A clean paper trail proves origin; it proves nothing about eligibility. The investor must be a national of a treaty country, and nationals of that country must generally hold at least fifty per cent of the enterprise. The amount must be lawfully sourced and substantial in proportion to the cost of this particular business rather than measured against any prescribed threshold, because no universal minimum figure exists; unpaid labour, personal time and determination are not capital and cannot be counted toward it. The enterprise must be real and operating and more than marginal — capable of producing more than a minimal living for the investor and family, or of making a significant economic contribution, with future capacity ordinarily expected within five years of normal operation. The investor must develop and direct the business, ordinarily through at least fifty per cent ownership or equivalent operational control. Intent to depart when E status ends remains necessary, and a Canadian applicant ordinarily requires an E visa.
What else is on your mind?
Is there one minimum investment that guarantees E-2 eligibility?Is holding money or owning an asset enough for E-2?Editorial source review: 2026-09-07. General preparation guidance, not an individual assessment.